EN - Impact Update Google 2020/12/03

Analysis done according to the websites evolutions on a period of 30 days (from 10 Novembre to the 10 December), using ahrefs datas (positions, audience) from every countries, every languages.

Correlation between On Site datas and the Update

INDEXATION

We observe a real correlation between :

STRUCTURE

CONTENU

Correlation between Off-site data and the Update

No data, during an analysis based on our first index, appeared on the off-site side. (Reminder: this index is based on the global evolution of the positioning on ahrefs).

So we decided to create another index, based on the average position of sites on the keywords we track in the NSN tool.

Taux d'ancres des liens

Anchor rates follow a triangular distribution. On average, 13.3% of anchors are found on the sites that had the largest falls, 12.8% on the sites that had the largest increases. The closer to 7.6%, the more stable the positioning.

It can also be seen that the average number of optimized anchors for sites on the rise (whatever the increase) is regular, close to 10%.

Données d'analyse de tous les sites réunis.

Distribution of backlinks

It appears that the sites with the least RD (85 on average) and with a higher percentage of links to the home page (72.6%) are those that have had the best results during the update.

Conversely, sites with a lot of links (129) but a lower distribution of links to the home page (59.7%) had the worst results.

We then took out from our datas sites that receive 301.

Tableau filtré sur les sites qui ne reçoivent aucune 301.

Here, too, the observation is striking:

35 sites with an average of 114 RD and 51% links to the home page : fall on targeted keywords.

32 Sites with an average of 56 RD and 70% links to the home page : improved results.

Moreover, 17 out of these 32 sites have known a strong increase, and have an average of 77.6% of links to their homepage.

Off site : Conclusion

It appears that the number of links made to the home page is a direct criterion of evolution during the previous update. The fall can be interpreted in two ways:

  1. Too many backlinks are made to internal pages,
  1. The homepages do not receive enough links.

We avoid drawing conclusions about anchor rates.

The way data is collected and stacked (only homepages, taking into account only the most used anchor), the differences in structure between sites (EMD, EMD now premium, Premium that target 'promo codes' on homepages), mean that our data is not sufficiently accurate.

We can still imagine that the "rule" of the 10% optimized anchors still seems to be valid, according to the data in the table.

What to do ?

It is important to remember that here, we only have data related to the impact of the update, and not on the overall health of the websites.

What did we learn during this update analysis? Essentially that the best practices of on-site SEO and the natural aspect of netlinking must be at the center of our actions.